Long Enough on the Mountain

If God allowed us to live on the “mountaintop,” we would not experience trials, but neither would we achieve any victories. The Israelites had gathered at the foot of Mount Horeb while God spoke to them and gave them His law. It was a breathtaking experience! Fire and smoke covered that awesome mountain; lightning flashed, and loud trumpet sounds pierced the air in a deafening crescendo! The ground at the foot of the mountain shook, and the people trembled in fear (Exod. 19:16-25).

As important as it was for God’s people to have this inspiring encounter with Him, their Lord had not rescued them from Egypt in order for them to settle around a mountain in the wilderness. God delivered them so that they could conquer the Promised Land. God wanted to demonstrate His power to the Israelites so that they would trust Him in their conquest of Canaan. Finally, God announced that they had been long enough at the mountain; it was time to go to battle.

The mountain is an enticing place to set up camp. Peter, James, and John were prepared to reside on the Mount of Transfiguration with Jesus, but their Lord knew that a demon-possessed boy needed their assistance down below (Matt. 17:4, 14-18). At times God will graciously provide you a mountaintop experience. These times come in many settings: during your time alone with Him, at a Christian conference, by reading a Christian book, or at a prayer meeting. You may wish you could spend the rest of your life basking in the glow of your encounter with God. But remember, these mountaintop encounters are God’s way of preparing you for the battles that await you.

Nothing Can Separate You

Nothing you could ever experience, no matter how terrible or frightening, could ever separate you from the love of God. No tribulation and distress you might ever suffer could be so intense that God’s love for you is not even more fervent. No persecution could be so painful that God’s love cannot bring comfort. Famine might starve you of food, but you will never hunger for the Father’s love. Poverty cannot strip you of God’s compassion, just as even death itself is incapable of robbing you of your heavenly Father’s infinite love.

If you base your view of God’s love on your circumstances, you will become confused. There may be times when you will ask, “How could a loving God allow this to happen to me?” You may begin to question what you find clearly stated in the Word of God. God promised that you would never be separated from His love; He did not say that you would never face hardship, persecution, poverty, or danger. If you doubt that God could love you and still allow you to experience difficult experiences, consider the life of Jesus.

If you allow the death of Jesus on the cross to forever settle any questions you might have about God’s love, you will approach difficult circumstances with confidence. Knowing that there will never be anything that could separate you from God’s perfect love, you will watch to see how God expresses His love in each circumstance. Don’t ever judge God’s love based on your circumstances. Instead, evaluate your circumstances from the perspective of God’s love.

Freely Give

There is no room for misers in God’s kingdom. When we begin to struggle in giving what we have to others, we have forgotten where we received our possessions. Every good thing we have ever received has come from God (James 1:17). All that we have acquired has been dependent upon His grace (1 Cor. 4:7). Job accurately summarized our condition: “Naked I came from my mother’s womb, / And naked shall I return there. / The Lord gave, and the Lord has taken away; / Blessed be the name of the Lord” (Job 1:21).

We easily assume a sense of ownership of our possessions, as if they were things we earned ourselves, thereby giving us a right to them. Jesus reminds us to be prepared to give our possessions as freely and joyfully as we received them. It should be a pleasure for us to give what we have to others (2 Cor. 9:7). We ought to be a conduit through whom the Lord can pour His blessings, knowing we will disperse them to everyone around us. Sometimes we claim we are trying to be good stewards of our resources when actually we are being selfish.

If you struggle to give freely to others, you have become more attached to the gift than to the Giver. The account of the rich young ruler shows the tragedy of becoming too attached to worldly treasures (Luke 8:18-24). Meditate on all that your Lord has given to you (John 3:16). Resolve to express your gratitude to Him through your giving.

The Key to Prosperity

There is a way to ensure that you prosper in what you do: serve the Lord with all your heart! Hezekiah, king of Judah, lived in a dangerous and tumultuous time. He faced powerful enemies. Idolatry was the popular religion of the day. His parents had rejected God and encouraged people to worship other gods (2 Chron. 28). Hezekiah had the opportunity to reject God as well, yet he chose to serve God with all of his heart. He did everything in his power to promote worship of the true God. He diligently followed God’s commandments. As a result of Hezekiah’s determination to serve God, God blessed him. Hezekiah thrived in an unsettled time because he resolved to follow God despite popular opinion.

God will honor the heart that commits to follow Him (2 Chron. 26:5). In times when worshiping God is not in vogue and when the forces of the day oppose Him, it takes courage and resolve to seek after God. God is pleased to prosper those who strive to please Him rather than to seek the approval of people (1 Sam. 2:30). Hezekiah stands in stark contrast to Rehoboam, an earlier king of Judah. It is said of Rehoboam that “he did evil, because he did not prepare his heart to seek the Lord” (2 Chron. 12:14). When you do not set your heart to seek the Lord, calamity is the inevitable result. The surest way to prosper in your endeavors is to diligently pursue the will of God.

Far Be It from Me!

It can be tempting at times to give up on God’s people! They are so imperfect and can be so sinful, yet they are His people. Samuel had thoroughly warned the Israelites of the dangers in appointing a king over Israel. Yet they wanted to be like the nations around them, insisting that they were willing to pay any price. Almost as soon as the people were granted their desire, they recognized their sin. But it was too late. What was Samuel to do? They had ignored his warnings. Now they wanted him to continue to minister to them. It would seem appropriate for Samuel to abandon them and allow them to suffer the consequences of their actions.Samuel knew, as Jesus knew, that God sends His servants to the sick, not the healthy (Matt. 9:12). Samuel did not take the people’s response as a rejection of him but as an indication of their walk with God. Samuel was serving God, not the Israelites. When God commanded him to minister to them, he could do nothing else, despite their resistance to his message.

At times people will not respond as they should to the message God speaks through you. Don’t become discouraged; it is a reflection of their relationship with God. You are God’s servant; if Jesus spent His time with the spiritually needy, you can expect Him to ask you to do the same. Don’t lose your patience with God’s people. Keep in mind that God loves them as much as He loves you.

Working Alone

In our zeal to please God and advance His kingdom, we Christians often take on responsibilities that God never intended us to have. One of the great challenges of the Christian life is determining what God does not want us to do! Our intentions are admirable: We love God, we love His people, and we see many needs around us. But sometimes our good intentions cause more harm than good.

Moses was aware of the need for someone to settle disputes among the Israelites. Someone had to help those former slaves learn how to live together as the people of God, so Moses took it upon himself to meet this need. Long lines of unhappy people, hoping to have their cases heard, stood before Moses each day. Moses spent day after day carrying the weight of his nation’s problems on his shoulders. Finally his father-in-law, an outsider, witnessed what Moses was doing and challenged the wisdom of his actions. Moses was taking on more than he could handle. He was wearing himself out trying to do what was impossible for one person. In doing this service alone, Moses was robbing others of an opportunity to serve the Lord. He was also doing a disservice to his people, who otherwise could have had their issues resolved much sooner.

When you become aware of a need, do not automatically assume God wants you to meet it. The only reason to perform ministry is that God clearly tells you it is His will. If you are feeling overwhelmed by all that you are doing, you are probably doing more than God has asked. Pray carefully about the assignments you take on, so that you don’t rob yourself and others of God’s best.

Godly Pursuits

A mark of spiritual maturity is a willingness to sacrifice personal comfort in order to strengthen other believers. Paul urges Christians to pursue only activities that promote peace and behavior that builds up others.

To pursue means to passionately focus one’s undistracted effort toward a goal. This is not a casual matter. It involves using all the resources God has given us to ensure growth and peace in the life of a fellow Christian. To the Colossian church, Paul said he labored, “striving . . . to present every man perfect in Christ” (Col. 1:28-29). This took concentration and effort!

For Paul, choosing to edify Christians meant refraining from any activity that caused others to stumble. He did not concern himself with his own rights or comforts because his greater priority, over his personal freedom, was to lead others to Christian maturity (1 Cor. 14:12, 26). This is how Jesus related to His disciples. He taught them that they could express no greater love than to lay down their lives for one another (John 15:13). As Christians, we ought to be so devoted to strengthening one another’s faith that we pursue this goal relentlessly, even if it means laying down our own lives. This behavior characterized the early churches (Acts 2:40-47). This is what love is like among God’s people (Gal. 6:9-10).

As God reveals to you what those around you need in order to grow in their faith, be prepared to make the necessary sacrifice on behalf of your fellow Christians (Col. 1:29).

If You Can Keep It: The Forgotten Promise of American Liberty by Eric Metaxas

[rating:3.0]

(New York: Penguin Books, 2016)

260 pgs

Eric Metaxas is an entertaining writer who has a gift for bringing influential leaders from history alive with his pen. His biographies of Wilberforce and Bonhoeffer are outstanding. This particular book is an interesting commentary on American “exceptionalism.” He argues that the United States was founded on a daringly new and radical concept– liberty for all (19). The reason their bold innovation worked, Metaxas argues, is because it was based on a moral people who were guided by their faith. Metaxas’ concern for today is that Americans have largely lost sight of what has made their nation great and, when you forget your past, you forget who you are. And, when a great nation forgets who it is, it will cease to be great.

Metaxas bases the title of his book on an encounter Benjamin Franklin had with a woman. Asked if he and the other founding fathers had created a republic or a monarchy, Franklin replied, “A republic, madam—if you can keep it” (9). Franklin well understood that they had just conceived something unprecedented and he was well aware of the dangers it faced. It’s greatest enemies, however, lay not without, but within. Should American ever lose sight of the great work that had been accomplished, they would be in danger of losing their freedom. Metaxas comments: “It’s our job to ‘keep’ the republic called America, and we can hardly keep what we don’t know we have” (21).

Metaxas argues that much of what has made America unique for over two centuries is being eroded today. For one, other nations have embraced America’s ideas and so not only are they no longer viewed as unique, they are not even viewed as American (22).

Metaxas argues that the daring idea of America was in the concept of self-government (77). Except for a short period in small Greek cities, no nation had been ruled by its citizens before. However, the founding fathers recognized that people could not rule themselves without falling into mob rule if there was not some restraining force that motivated them to act virtuously. That important ingredient to a just society was religion, or faith (34). Metaxas notes, “They knew that religious people were less likely to misbehave” (34). Metaxas concludes: “The faith and virtue of the American people made possible the most free nation in the history of the world” (37).

Metaxas cites Os Guinness and his concept of the “Golden Triangle of Freedom” from his book, A Free Peoples’ Suicide (37). In that book, Guinness claims there are three sides to a free nation. He argues that Freedom requires virtue. A depraved society cannot manage itself. It will inevitably degenerate into anarchy and a dictator will emerge to bring about order. Second, virtue requires faith. It is nonsense to believe that people will simply act virtuously on their own. Guinness notes that the west was deeply influenced by Judeo-Christian ethics. Unlike the French Revolution that was based on secularism and anti-church sentiment, America was founded on the foundation of Judea-Christian beliefs. Third, faith requires freedom. That is, you cannot legislate belief. You can only provide freedom for people to believe.

Metaxas cites the observation of Benjamin Franklin who noted that “only virtuous people . . . are capable of freedom.” (55). He also examines the famous observations of Alexis de Tocqueville who observed the United States in 1831. He wrote: “Not until I went into the churches of America and heard her pulpits aflame with righteousness did I understand the secret of her genius and power. America is great because she is good, and if America ever ceases to be good, she will cease to be great” (59). He went on to note: “While the law permits the Americans to do what they please, religion prevents them from conceiving, and forbids them to commit, what is rash or unjust” (64).

Metaxas is concerned that as the United States becomes increasingly unreligious, the basis of its virtue is being eroded. Without common decency and morals, society will devolve into anarchy. Today, people take America’s strength and future for granted, but they fail to understand the nature of its greatness, or that it is not guaranteed.

I agree with the basic tenets Metaxas puts forth. Especially in recent days, it has been appalling to watch American society seemingly degenerating on numerous fronts. Corruption, immorality, and a constant drive to push indecency to deeper and deeper levels, are all signs that a common moral standard and belief is no longer undergirding the nation.

Metaxas argues that Liberals make the mistake of assuming that liberty is the same as license. That is, for a people to be free, they should be allowed to indulge in any depth of depravity they choose without any intervention from others. Metaxas claims that Conservatives make the mistake of assuming that, if given their freedom, people will naturally embrace it and cherish it. Recent history has proven that people who have not been educated to understand virtue or freedom, are not prepared to handle freedom when it is given to them.

While I enjoy Metaxas’ style and his ability to bring to life ancient heroes, I do at times question some of what can appear to be idealized history. For example, he asks, “Who today would dare to say the poor should look after themselves and that no one bears any responsibility to help them?” (74). Apparently Metaxas does not read right wing blogs or listen to right wing podcasts! There are many on the extreme right wing who resent giving any of their tax money for such causes as helping the poor. This lack of concern is most likely further evidence that the virtue and faith of America has eroded.

Metaxas also tends to give too much credit to American heroes such as Franklin, Jefferson, and Lincoln. He argues that Jefferson must have been a person of faith due to some of his writings (66). This seems a bit naïve. Clearly Jefferson was well-versed in the literature of that day which made ample use of biblical imagery. Nevertheless, it is clear that neither he nor Lincoln ever came to a personal faith in the Christ of Scripture.

Metaxas also states, “Since the Pilgrims came to our shores in 1620, religious freedom and religious toleration has been the single most important principle of American life” (70). Again, this may be true, but it needs to be qualified. New England Congregationalists were indeed concerned with their own religious freedom to worship in a manner of their own choosing without fear of the Church of England harassing them. However, Congregationalists often acted as if theirs was the only true and acceptable way to worship God and they were not adverse arresting and persecuting those who did not hold to their views. Anabaptists, Quakers, and Baptists were whipped and jailed by Congregationalists who supposedly believed in religious freedom. Baptists and others in Virginia and suffered much discrimination until the First Amendment was finally added to the Constitution. While it is true that America provided more liberty than any other major nation on earth for religion, that was something that had to be worked out over time.

Metaxas describes George Whitefield as the Founding Spiritual father of America” (113). Whitefield’s declaration that every man was accountable to God, helped to create an egalitarian system where even the magistrates were to be judged for how they treated those under their rule. And, while not arguing that Whitefield played an enormous role in shaping the American culture before the Revolution, Metaxas may be overstating the case to say of Whitefield, “without whom the United States simply could not have come into being” (77).

Metaxas does make a strong case for knowing the heroes” of the past. He declares, “After all, if we don’t know the stories of America, how can we know America?” (131). Metaxas would argue that the statues and memorials of America’s past need to be preserved so we know our past, both good and bad, so that we know ourselves, both the good and evil of which we are capable.

Metaxas argues for American “exceptionalism” (182). While such a concept was downplayed under Barak Obama, Metaxas argues that America has truly made an enormous contribution to the world and Americans; need to be reminded of it. Metaxas argues that it is good to love one’s country, as long as it is a healthy, honest love. For that, a nation’s people must be educated and helped to know and understand its past.

Metaxas closes the book by citing Abraham Lincoln’s warning that no outside enemy can destroy America, but America can kill itself from within (216).

Overall I enjoyed this book. In light of the condition of American society today, it is a stark warning. Americans take far too much for granted. Americans assume they are good and great because they are Americans. This is a very relevant book for today. Metaxas makes use of the voices of the past to help shine a clear light on our path of today.

by Richard Blackaby

Be Known for Something: Reconnect with Community by Revitalizing Your Church’ Reputation by Mark Macdonald

[rating:3.0]

(Houston: High Bridge Books, 2017)

211 pgs

This is a specialized book. It is written to help churches connect with their local communities. Too many churches assume people know what they are like. They assume they know what their reputation is. But they are usually wrong.

Mark Macdonald is a consultant who leads a company that help churches reconnect with their community. He recently was hired to work with the Florida Baptist Convention. Interestingly, he also did consulting work with the church of which I am a member, in Jonesboro, Georgia.

Macdonald points out that almost 4,000 churches in America close their doors for the last time, every year (4). 43% of Millennials will drop out of church within the next ten years (4). Churches often realize that something is wrong. After all, it is obvious that their numbers are declining. Yet often churches are bewildered why people are not drawn to their fine services and their friendly people.

In this book, Macdonald presents much of the material he uses to help churches in his consulting business. In chapter two, he addresses the crucial aspect of “Perception versus Reality.” (13) He points out that churches see themselves differently than people in their community do.  Of course someone who has grown up all their lives in a church will see it as “friendly,” whereas a first time visitor might view those same people as aloof or unfriendly.

Macdonald also argues that churches need to develop more than a mission statement. They need to determine what they will be “known” for. He notes: “Rarely does a mission statement ever lead to a ‘sale.’” (15). He adds: “A mission statement doesn’t give a reason for them to attend—an unconverted community member is not going to want to ‘win the world for Jesus Christ’ as many mission statements insist . . . we must stop leading with our internal messaging.” (26)

Macdonald argues that “It’s all about benefits” (26). That is, people in your community must see some value your church provides that they need. He argues that churches should promote what they have to offer, rather than their name or mission statement. He notes: “We have found that people are apt to remember what a church is known for than the church’s actual name” (30). He adds: “Any name that needs an explanation is usually not a good option” (98).

Throughout the remainder of the book, Macdonald guides readers through a process of developing as logo and a campaign for connecting with their community. He offers plenty of practical advice that stems from years of consulting.

Macdonald is an engaging writer, as you would expect for such a topic. He delves into some pretty technical, specialized material which can be helpful to someone dealing with these issues. Obviously this book is not for everyone. However, if you are in a church that is failing to connect with your community or even a business that is trying to become known in your community, this book is filled with valuable suggestions.

by Richard Blackaby

The Joy of Following Jesus by J. Oswald Sanders

[rating:4.0]

(Chicago: Moody Press, 1990)

156 pgs

I have always enjoyed reading Oswald Sanders. Formerly a missionary executive, he spent many years teaching leadership principles as well as lessons on the Christian life. Perhaps his best-known book is Spiritual Leadership. When I was starting out in my own leadership journey, this book was deeply impactful on me. It actually was the title my father and I chose when we wrote our own book on leadership. This particular edition is a revised edition produced for the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association. I believe I received it will speaking at the Cove a while back.

I always enjoy reading the “older” writers on the Christian life. They seem to have a keen insight into as well as reverence for God’s word along with a penchant for practical application. Though I try to keep up on the latest influential books of our age, I am increasingly drawn to the “classics” of years gone by.

I am increasingly drawn to these shorter books of under 200 pages. They present plenty to think about while not overwhelming the reader with more material than they can handle. What drew me to this book was twofold. First, it is a strong biblical exposition on what it means to be a disciple of Jesus. This is a subject I am currently focusing on and will be writing on myself. Second, it highlights the joy we experience when we do follow Jesus.  Sanders notes that the word “disciple” is used 269 times in the New testament, while the term “Christian” is only used three times (8). The word “Believers” is only used twice. He also points out that the word disciple means “learner” (25).

I will not take time to summarize all that sanders teaches in this book. He makes a number of memorable statements and provides a refreshing look at what it meant for the disciples to follow Jesus. He claims: “The Lord did not make the comfort of the messenger the deciding factor” (27) and “The Lord offers us no security except in Himself” (35). He also states: “The business of living the Christian life as it should be lived is too lofty in its ideals and too exacting in its demands for us to engage alone. We desperately need a partner with adequate capital to make it a success” (49). Sanders adds: “But is God so unreasonable as to make impossible demands and then hold us responsible for our failure?” (50). He also states: “The Holy Spirit will not consent to be a sleeping partner, although He may be a secret partner” (52).

Sanders occasionally makes some thought-provoking statements, such as: “Only twice in Scripture is Christ specifically stated to be our example. . . He was only manifesting in time what he had always been in eternity” (58). Here are a few other quotations that caught my attention:

“A pessimist will never be an inspiring leader” (60).

“Perhaps God is not so economical and utilitarian as we are” (71)

“We tend to become like those we admire” (76)

“A glance at Christ will save, but it is the gazing at Christ that sanctifies” (76)

“The presence or absence of spiritual maturity is never more noticeable than in one’s attitude to the changing circumstances of life” (77)

“Our enemy chooses his timing shrewdly” (79)

“In reality there should be no such thing as an undisciplined disciple.” (85)

“They seldom soar above past experience or natural thought. How seldom we pray the unprecedented, let alone the impossible.” (99)

“God delights to answer daring prayers that are based on His promises” (99)

“It is shameless persistence that comes away with full hands” (101)

“The only right a Christian has is the right to give up his rights” (106)

Sanders also humorously quotes someone who stated, “He was so crooked he could hide behind a corkscrew!” (133).

Two statements I might challenge are these. First, he stated that Jesus was lonely (121). Perhaps he would have explained that there were times his earthly companions could not understand, or go with Jesus. However, it is clear that Jesus always enjoyed fellowship with His Father as well as the Holy Spirit. This probably just to make a point, but it could have been explained better. Should a Christian be lonely? Should God’s presence in our life be enough? It would seem that Jesus was constantly seeking to escape the crowds so He could enjoy solitary time with His Father.

Secondly, Sanders cites the example of William Carey who was providentially delayed from leaving for the mission field and, as a result, his wife ultimately decided to accompany him to India (109). Sanders was a missionary leader and so he would have found comfort in the story. However, the rest of the story is that Carey’s wife ultimately went insane, trapped on the other side of the world with her missionary husband. Anyone who is familiar with that history would have been reluctant to use that particular illustration to make Sanders’ point.

That said, I enjoyed this book and would recommend it to others. It always does one good to draw close to Jesus and His disciples and to see the enormous possibilities when we follow Jesus. Here is a prayer Sanders included:

“O God, that I might have towards my God a heart of flame,

Towards my fellow men a heart of love,

Towards myself, a heart of steel.” (85).

by Richard Blackaby